Recently the
Halifax Chronicle Herald ran an article titled "Put People First." In it, staff writer Bill Power reported that the "customer's always right" maxim, which has guided generations of retailers, has no currency with a new generation of employees.
Power's interviews with a variety of human resources experts revealed that members of Gen Y won't take rudeness from customers or employers. In fact,
Alexander Kjerulf, author of
Happy Hour is Nine to Five, points out that customers are often wrong "and managers do a huge disservice to mistreated employees when supporting a rude customer." The experts say that blind adherence to the old customer's always right maxim will result in the loss of the customer and the staff member.
In the article, Kjerulf asserts that "the most important relationship a business has today is not with a particular customer, but with its loyal employees." He concludes that if employers put their people first, staff will, in turn, put customers first.
This is an article of the times: Retail sales staff will no longer tolerate abuse or even cranky customers. In turn, consumers have become even more demanding (often irrationally so). Throw into the mix the fact that a release today from the
Canadian Tourism Resource Council revealed that in the next two years the tourism industry will see a dramatic labor shortage (70,000 unfilled positions) and the need to keep staff happy takes on even greater importance. But, the reality is that you can't run a business if you're afraid of losing a customer or a staff member.
Blind adherence to the idea that the staff is always right is no smarter than fidelity to the idea that the customer is always right. In the article, Brenda Fair, a partner at
Fairwinds Training and Development, points out that employers have to train people to handle unruly clients; "that 80 percent of difficult clients can be turned around with the right approach." That's a good idea. But really, in the end, shouldn't common sense rule the day? And, shouldn't we all try to be reasonable, accommodating and civil?