The Dollar Dilemma: Simplifications, Omissions and Misinformation
No 69.4%
Yes 30.7%
No 69.4%
Yes 30.7%
"The market will do what it has to do. The strange thing is that purchasing power parity pegs the Canadian dollar at under $US 1.00. PPP, if you don't know, directly compares the value of work that it takes to purchase the same item in both countries. If government gets involved, it will be purely political, as when the Minister of Finance last week said he was going to meet with major retailers and tell them to lower their prices. My letter to the editor which was published in the Vancouver SUN read: 'So Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is instructing retailers to lower their prices because of the stronger Canadian dollar. Mr. Flaherty is apparently unaware that goods cost more in Canada because of much higher transportation costs due to Canada’s immense size, and much higher Federal Gas Taxes. Taxes that his department sets. He is apparently unaware that the Canadian government charges much higher duty rates than does the United States. Duty rates that his department sets. He is apparently unaware that minimum wages (set by government) are higher in many parts of Canada than in many parts of the USA He is apparently unaware that stores are selling goods that they bought months ago when the dollar was weaker. He is apparently unaware that the USA market is more than eleven times the size of the Canadian market. California by itself is bigger than Canada. He is apparently unaware that economies of scale are very powerful. Perhaps he missed that lecture in bookkeeper school. Given all these fundamentals, Mr. Flaherty seems to be catastrophically incompetent to be the minister in charge of finance."
According to the study, consumers now base their decisions on where to shop based on their emotional needs, which include the overall perception of the shopping experience like atmosphere, trust and customer service and whether or not a store is fun and enjoyable. In fact, 35 percent of consumers in 2007 stated they prefer an enjoyable experience over traditional, rational factors such as price and convenience, compared to 30 percent in 2002.
"The decline of the attractiveness of the big box stores, the aging of America, the growth in the importance of convenience, personalized service and the emotional consumer 'where to shop drivers' are causing a tipping point going in favor of smaller stores for the first time in over 20 years," said Chris Ohlinger, CEO of SIRS.
Download file
"I think it's high time for Canadians to become smarter consumers, and quit selling out to the great USA. Do we really want to become another annex of the US? Our country has so much to offer, and we have always thrived on the entrepreneurial spirit here, which will fade quickly as long as we are willing to sell out to the cheapest bidder. I find it interesting that when the local clubs want support - either a cash donation, or a prize or gift certificate for their events -- they manage to find my shop, but when they want to spend their consumer dollar, the big boxes win. Frustrating."
Some retailers say they are emphasizing accessories to make the in-store experience more fun for shoppers at a time when online shopping and gift cards are on the rise.
1. Sin of the Hidden Trade-Off: e.g. "Energy-efficent" electronics that contain hazardous materials. Fifty-seven percent (998 products) of all environmental claims committed this Sin.
2. Sin of No Proof:: e.g. Shampoos claiming to be "certified organic," but with no verifiable certification. 454 products and 26 percent of environmental claims committed this Sin..
3. Sin of Vagueness: e.g. Products claiming to be 100 percent natural when many naturally-occuring substances are hazardous, like arsenic and formaldehyde. Seen in 196 products or 11 percent of environmental claims.
4. Sin of Irrelevance: e.g. Products claiming to be CFC-free, even though CFCs were banned 20 years ago. This Sin was seen in 78 products and 4 percent of environmental claims.
5. Sin of Fibbing: e.g. Products falsely claiming to be certified by an internationally recognized environmental standard like EcoLogo, Energy Star or Green Seal. Found in 10 products or less than 1 percent of environmental claims.
6. Sin of Lesser of Two Evils: e.g. Organic cigarettes or a hybrid-yet-efficient SUV. This occurred in 17 products or 1 percent of environmental claims.
1. Status Spheres - "A variety of lifestyles, activities and persuasions, which can be mixed and matched by consumers looking for recognition from various crowds and scenes." Two examples: Online Sphere and Eco Sphere.
2. Premiumization of "everything and anything."
3. Snack Culture - This trend "embodies the phenomenon of products, services and experiences becoming more temporary and transient; products that are being deconstructed in easier to digest, easier to afford bits, making it possible to collect even more experiences…in an even shorter timeframe."
4. Online Oxygen- The company identifies this "connecting sphere" as a mega-trend. In 2008, the phone will introduce even more people to the online world.
5. Eco-Iconic "Eco-friendly goods and services sporting bold, iconic design and markers, that help their eco-conscious owners to visibly tout their eco-credentials to peers."
6. Brand Butlers- This trend embraces the idea of assisting your potential customers "in smart, relevant ways, making the most of your products and whatever it is your brand stands for."
7. MIY: Make It Yourself - The "participation sphere": digital creation - movies, blogs, music.
8. Crowd Mining - This is how the company sees "crowd-based business concepts evolving in 2008."
This page contains all entries posted to Editorial Blog in November 2007. They are listed from oldest to newest.
December 2007 is the next archive.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.